This model describes an evolving path of human consciousness, structured into successive stages of integration. The individual begins this journey with a spiritual questionnaire, whose purpose is to establish a baseline — a starting measurement against which later progress can be assessed.

They then access structured content, delivered as a reading chapter, and take up a free daily practice of about twenty minutes, which may extend over a longer period. The system resembles an academic framework in this respect, built around a body of readings. It should be stressed, however, that the intended results do not lie in the text itself: the text is a support, not the goal, of the transformation sought.

This progress unfolds across four learning cycles — recognition, differentiation, integration, and stabilization. Each represents a stage of gradual integration of knowledge, experience, and inner transformation.

Software accompanies the whole path: it measures the stages completed, keeps a history of the journey, and lets one observe the evolution of consciousness over time. It acts as a tool for tracking, analysis, and support, all while respecting each individual's own freedom and pace.

A final element, T, measures the time spent on the site reading the books, poetry and blog and taking part in discussions — practice of the levels does not count, as it has its own timers. It is worth 16% of Acmé and reaches 100% after 25 cumulative hours. The full formula is: Acmé = 0.10(BE+EXA+0.5·(L1+L2+L3+L4)+P1+P2+P3+P4+0.4·A+1.6·T) = 1.

The mathematical goal of the model is formalized as a convergence from Acmé = 0 toward Acmé = 1.

The key, or improvement method, is granted on condition of obtaining a score of 70% on the spiritual questionnaire.

This article presents a theoretical model of human consciousness development conceived as a gradual, measurable, longitudinal process. It is organized around the following question: to what extent can an inner progression — traditionally held to be subjective and unquantifiable — be structured into defined stages, instrumented by a tracking system, and made observable over time? The model proposes to answer this by combining a practice protocol, a taxonomy of progression phases, and a mathematical formalization of the trajectory.

The path opens with a preliminary questionnaire whose function is diagnostic: it sets a baseline — a starting measurement against which all later change can be evaluated. This step gives the model its comparative dimension, replacing an impressionistic appraisal with an explicit anchor point. It should be stressed that a key is granted upon passing the questionnaire, subject to obtaining a score of at least 70%.

The subject then accesses structured content, delivered as a reading chapter, and takes up a free daily practice of about twenty minutes, which may extend over an extended period. The system resembles an academic framework in this respect, organized around a body of readings. One epistemological caveat must be noted: the text is not the site of the result, but its support. The intended transformation proceeds from the practice itself, the text serving only as its medium.

Progress unfolds across four successive phases — recognition, differentiation, integration, and stabilization. The recognition phase corresponds to initial awareness, where the subject identifies the contents and states that make up their experience. The differentiation phase marks the ability to distinguish, discern, and order what at first appeared undifferentiated. The integration phase weaves these distinct elements into a coherent whole, assimilating the knowledge and experience gained. The stabilization phase, finally, consolidates this integrated state and makes it lasting, shielding what has been gained from fluctuation. Each phase thus represents a stage of ever-deepening integration, combining the acquisition of knowledge, the accumulation of experience, and inner transformation.

Software accompanies the entire path. It serves three complementary functions: measuring the stages completed, preserving a history of the journey, and observing the evolution of consciousness over time. It thus acts as an instrument of tracking, analysis, and support, guided throughout by respect for each subject's own freedom and pace — the system records the trajectory without constraining it.

The goal of the model is formalized as a convergence: the subject's trajectory is described by a state parameter Acmé moving from its initial value Acmé = 0 toward its limit value Acmé = 1. This normalized parameter, bounded on the interval [0, 1], represents the degree of completion of the process; the value 0 denotes the initial state (entry into recognition) and the value 1 the state of full stabilization sought as the asymptote of the path.